EMERGING TOOLS:
LEGISLATION PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF NATURE

Legislative Protection of Rights of Nature

In Canada, legislation may be made by federal, provincial or municipal governments.  The Canadian Constitution1 sets out the matters about which the federal and provincial governments may pass legislation. Municipalities are not mentioned in the Canadian Constitution, they are created by provincial legislation and may only make laws as set out in that legislation.

Because of the division of powers set out in the Canadian Constitution, both the federal and provincial governments have authority to pass legislation relating to different aspects of the environment 2 .  For example, the federal government has authority over fisheries, migratory birds, navigable waters, federal Crown lands, and transboundary projects (like pipelines that cross provincial borders).  The federal government may also address environmental matters using its criminal law, trade and commerce, or POGG (peace, order and good government) powers. Provincial governments, on the other hand, have authority over provincial Crown lands and resources, local matters, and property and civil rights which result in significant provincial authority over environmental matters.  A province may choose to delegate some its authority over environmental matters to municipalities (via legislation).

This means that all three levels of government have authority to pass legislation, or bylaws in the case of municipalities, that explicitly recognize and protect some Rights of Nature.  To date, we do not have such legislation in Canada (with the exception of the mirror Municipal and First Nation resolutions recognizing personhood of the Magpie River).

Although it not does not expressly acknowledge and protect rights of nature, Title II of Bolivia’s Constitution 3 – entitled Environment, Natural Resources, Land and Territory – contains several provisions relating to the environment and its various components such as water, biodiversity, and forests.  Article 342 states that it is the duty of the State and the population to “conserve, protect and use natural resources and the biodiversity in a sustainable manner, as well as to maintain the equilibrium of the environment”.  There are also several provisions specific to protection of the Bolivian Amazon basin (Art. 390 to 392).  The Bolivian Constitution also provides a right to a “healthy, protected, and balanced environment” and a right to “take legal action in defense of environmental rights” (Art. 33 and 34).

It is in legislation that Bolivia expressly acknowledges and protects the rights of nature:  The Law of the Rights of Mother Earth, Law No. 071/2010 4 and the Framework Law of Mother Earth and Integral Development for Living Well, Law No. 300/2012 5.  Law No. 071/2010 characterizes Mother Earth as a “collective public interest… entitled to inherent rights” as set out in the law.  Under this law, Mother Earth has rights to:

  • life;
  • diversity of life;
  • water;
  • clean air;
  • equilibrium (maintenance or restoration of the interrelationship, interdependence, complementarity and functionality of the components of Mother Earth in a balanced way for the continuation of their cycles and reproduction of their vital processes);
  • restoration of living systems affected by human activities; and
  • pollution free living.

More detail regarding the rights of nature are provided in Law No. 300 which sets out several requirements, including:

  • Undertaking precaution to prevent or avoid damage to the components of Mother Earth including the environment, biodiversity, human health and intangible cultural values.
  • A guarantee of restoration of Mother Earth by any person that causes damage to the components, zones and life system of Mother Earth.
  • A guarantee of regeneration of Mother Earth in which any person with rights to own, use or exploit a component of Mother Earth must respect the regeneration capacities of the components, zones and life systems of Mother Earth.

In the United States several municipalities have passed ordinances (in Canada, we call these municipal bylaws) recognizing the rights of nature 6.  For example, the municipality of Tamaqua Borough, Pennsylvania passed a rights based ordinance making it unlawful for corporations to interfere with or cause damage to natural communities and  ecosystems ) 7. This ordinance states that “natural communities, and ecosystems shall be considered “persons” for purposes of the enforcement of … civil rights”.

In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, an ordinance was passed to prevent fracking 8.  Section 618.03 of Pittsburgh’s Code of Ordinances states that “natural communities and ecosystems, including, but not limited to, wetlands, streams, rivers, aquifers, and other water systems, possess inalienable and fundamental rights to exist and flourish” 9.  Further, the Code states that residents of the City possess legal standing to enforce those rights on behalf of the natural communities and ecosystems 10.

There are also ordinances in Mora County, New Mexico; Spokane, Washington; Barnstead, New Hampshire; Blaine, Washington County; Shapleigh, Maine; Santa Monica, California; and others 11.

Footnotes

  1. online: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/
  2. Sections 91 and 92, Canadian Constitution, online: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/
  3. English translation, online: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Bolivia_2009.pdf#page76
  4. online: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/bol144985.pdf, for English translation, online: http://www.worldfuturefund.org/Projects/Indicators/motherearthbolivia.html
  5. online: https://www.lexivox.org/norms/BO-L-N300.xhtml?dcmi_identifier=BO-L-N300&format=xhtml, for English Translation, online: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/7220617-Framework-Law-of-Mother-Earth-and-Integral.html
  6. Robin R. Milan, Rivers and Natural Ecosystems as Rights Bearing Subjects, online: www.TheRightsofNature.org
  7. Tamaqua Borough Sewage Sludge Ordinance, online: http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload666.pdf
  8. Madeleine Sheehan Perkins,  How Pittsburgh embraced a radical environmental movement popping up in conservative towns across America (July 9, 2017) Insider, online: https://www.businessinsider.com/rights-for-nature-preventing-fracking-pittsburgh-pennsylvania-2017-7
  9. online:https://library.municode.com/pa/pittsburgh/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_TITSIXCO_ARTIRERIAC_CH618MASHNAGADR_S618.03STLIGPIRENAEN
  10. online: https://library.municode.com/pa/pittsburgh/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_TITSIXCO_ARTIRERIAC_CH618MASHNAGADR_S618.03STLIGPIRENAEN
  11. Peter Burdon, “Earth Rights: The Theory” (2011) IUCN Academy of Environmental Law e-Journal Issue (1) and Robin R. Milan, Rivers and Natural Ecosystems as Rights Bearing Subjects, online: www.TheRightsofNature.org